Talking Christianity: Hello, Dust!

The Soil of Separation and the Remarriage of the Earth

Adam and Adamah — Dust, Flesh, Land, and Labour

“Ministers will be out of a job in the new creation, unlike gardeners and builders!” — said Tim Keller (apparently), according to an old mate after church recently.

Then he added, point-blank: “But what about software engineers?”

My left eyebrow raised even as my right furrowed — not at the notion of new-creational kingdom work, nor at glorified gardening and building, or art, replacing ministry and other vocations — but at the piercing question which, like a splinter under my fingernail, made me wince. My knee-jerk response was curt:

“No! At the consummation we will be embodied in direct, glorified communion with Creation—one-flesh made whole. What God had joined together we have separated: software and its engineering is symptomatic estrangement, a token of our divorce from the ground itself, training us either toward communion or further exile—it catechises our bodies toward one or the other.”

He wasn’t convinced. Nor were my onlookers. His question was more than a teaser; though tease it out, we certainly tried. It tied us both up in knots, drawing further ears. Leaving that evening, the shard came home with me. Now it sits before my tweezers.

This essay is what I’ve managed, so far, to dig up—an attempt to loosen the deep root inside that question. This is no trifle about heaven’s staffing plans; it is the infected wound of humanity’s meaning — what it means to be human beings (or perhaps better, human doings). This is not a denominational puzzle but a human one: what a human is, what a human is for — ontology before teleology, being before doing.

Before Adam was priest or worker, he was dust — Spirit-breathed earth. Ontology precedes vocation, and everything else flows from that — Adam as Spirit-breathed adamah is the hinge on which the rest turns. And beneath even this hinge stands God’s own work (melākâ): the seventh-day holiness by which God ceases from creating and sets the frame within which all human “doing” can only ever be response. (We should reserve work for God’s melākâ and speak of human service/labour instead—ceasing from creating, not from sustaining/indwelling.) We will speak of these things only within the Seventh: God’s melākâ completed and ceased (Gen 2:1–3); there is no ‘before/after’ across Gen 1:1–2:4a—only life inside Sabbath.

Which labours are stitched into creation’s fabric, destined to be transfigured and remain? Which are scaffolds — mercies raised for our wounded hour — that will be thanked and retired when the feast begins? Which are distortions that collapse in judgment? And which are seeds — abiding vocations — that grow into trees in glory? Discernment here is covenantal: dust abides and awaits raising; flesh (relation) requires cleansing and renewal.

The question carries a pang, a groan against nihilism that cries, “Eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” But another voice, older and steadier, answers: “Your labour in the Lord is not in vain.” This hope is bodily: the freedom of resurrected children in the same bodies, scars and all.

Here is the hope: this present life is “preparing us for an eternal weight of glory,” and our work now is tied to creation’s own deliverance, when it will come into “the glorious freedom of the children of God.”

It’s one thing to say ministers will be re-employed as gardeners or builders or artists. It’s another to say that our work itself may — or may not — survive the fire of judgment, for “this world in its present form is passing away.” Tolkien caught a glimpse of this in Leaf by Niggle, where a broken painter’s sub-creation is met, healed, and revealed on the far side of dawn. Paul says the same in prose: creation will be liberated from decay and brought into the freedom of the resurrected children — this same body, scars and all.

But answers about work’s future rest first on authority: not on the oldest myth or the cleverest reading, but on the Voice that names us. General revelation declares glory; special revelation declares what that glory is. Genesis is prophetic ontology: the end from the beginning; the seventh day is open/unclosed (no evening–morning), the frame within which history unfolds. The Voice also sets grammar: work (melākâ) is God’s alone; our verbs are serve and guard.

This is why the question about software matters: not dirt versus keys, but communion versus exile. Not because God prefers dirt or splinters under fingernails to clean keyboards, but because certain kinds of work are what it means to be human as such — Adam himself, ontologically. Other kinds are not: they may be distortions, deepening the divide and sending us further from our first marriage to creation; or they may be mercies for our wounded hour, scaffolds and concessions for a broken state; and yet others may be functional labours tied only to this passing schema. This is not a Luddite instinct but a Sabbath instinct. Two trees will train this discernment: life as gift-as-food to be received; wisdom as gift-not-food to be revered—limit as praise, not appetite.

If some work is “being human” in an everlasting sense, then discernment has teeth. Labour is either of a substance that endures in glory or of one that does not survive. Some will suffer loss — seeing all their works burned — though they themselves will be saved. Others will find that what they built with gold, silver, and costly stones has endured. This is the sharp edge of judgment for Christians, “saved, yet as through fire.” Creatures do not have immortality as possession; life is received in communion. The promise is entering the Day, not recovering a substance.

This article moves from anthropology to theology, but only as six within the seventh: Dust, Ground, Image, Serve, Guard, Flesh—all spoken inside the divine word Work (melākâ) completed and ceased. Therefore, we should avoid ‘before/after’ across Gen 1:1–2:4a; we should speak of life within/from/inside Sabbath. We begin with the creature’s ontology to teach its vocation, yet our final word is God’s: the Sabbath grammar that encloses all being. So from the first page, I will say it plainly: God alone works; we are His workmanship. Sabbath is the holiness of His ceasing from creating—the open Day with no “evening and morning”—and all human vocations live inside that finished, unshareable work.

The path forward is simple: an embodied parable, a thesis said plain, then the scroll opened at Moab. To see why this is the hinge, begin with the parable; then hear the claim said plain, and finally open the scroll where the Voice first names us — “In beginning …” on Moab’s edge. From here the Name matters: Elohim (Gen 1) becomes YHWH Elohim (Gen 2)—the same Creator now named as Covenant Lord who summons and binds. Adam is first-Abraham and first-Moses: a covenant call within the finished world to serve and guard.

Some housekeeping for this essay: we should say “ceasing from creating,” not “resting from work”; avoiding “before/after” across Gen 1:1–2:4a—using “within/from/inside.” We should reserve work for God’s melākâ unless marked as “human” labour/service, and treat flesh (bāśār/sarx) on the covenant axis (dust needs raising, flesh needs cleansing). In short: His ceasing is His reign; our labour is consenting service and guarding within it.

An embodied parable

If that question about estrangement and return to the ground has a parable, it is written now in my own body.

This is a splinter that hits the nerves in me — literally, not only the metaphoric wiring embedded in memory. I have Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) that has been progressively wearing down my neural pathways from the beginning — like rusting hardware which, once damaged, can no longer run its software properly. My neurologist describes a secondary disorder overlaying the first: a Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) — the software plays up because the hardware isn’t running as it should, so both mind (cognition) and body (physiology) misbehave — like an operating system on a warped circuit board, throwing faults and impairing the apps it’s running.

The result: I can no longer do my job. I have resigned from formal roles and vocational posts — and let go of the prospect of any gainful employment in the future, in any vocational career or service. My treatment plan involves a complete relinquishment of formal roles and a return to a childlike grounding at home: like a toddler who, between the routines of daily living, spends time in the backyard, playing in the sandpit and puddles; or like a circus animal retired early and released back into the garden of its innocence, with no need to over-perform — climbing trees, turning over stones — just as at the beginning.

Unable to drive, use transport, or even want to, at 46 I am grounded — and relieved. I have made myself intentionally redundant and returned to the land that raised me. Sandfly, Tasmania: clay-sodden earth holds water as if made to be dammed. Brooks meet; rivulets run with cold mist. Here the earth and I are kin re-connecting — Adam remembering Adamah, returning to right relationship with his own ground, hearing again the call of shared being and answering with fidelity — a conciliation awaiting reconciliation. This is not therapy. My knees need to bend and dig into the mud; sometimes a bum-shuffle is all I can manage.

This is not DIY rehab, old-school. Not long-service leave, but long-suffering leaves — literal leaves of healing. I am pruning, regrafting, and replanting myself in the soil to re-bud healthy shoots: unwiring knotted neurons with sunlight; confessing stress in mud; doing penitence in clay; baptising in rainwater. This is repentance from estrangement. The soil is the liturgy; the wind, the catechism. In the breath over clay, I am relearning that to live is to be animated earth — the priesthood of dust restored. Before I pick up any office again, I am remembering what I am: dust — Spirit-breathed earth — and learning, once more, how to be a priest. And in these small obediences I meet again the seventh-day mercy: God alone works (melākâ); I do not. I am not asked to “work for God,” but to consent to His work — to cease from self-making so the Breath may keep and guard the ground through me, within His ceasing-from-creating.

So the body itself has become commentary; what follows, the claim said plain.

Thesis said plain

Humanity is Spirit-breathed earth. Adam is not merely on the ground (adamah); Adam is of the ground — adamah animated. He is dust (ʿāphār) animated by the Breath of God. Living means Breath in ground. Ontology precedes vocation: the human being precedes the human doing. Before Adam bears office, Adam is dust-one; before Israel bears law, Israel bears dust-oneship. This is the crux. The human is Adam as Spirit-animated adamah — placed not to “work” (a word Scripture reserves for God’s melākâ), but to serve (ʿābad) and guard (šāmar) the adamah, to bring creation to its Creator and bear the Creator’s blessing to His creation. Image and priest are the shape this being takes; they are vocation from ontology, not a task taped onto it. Dominion therefore is liturgy, not possession. And all of this lives inside God’s prior action — melākâ completed and ceased. God alone “works”; Adam is His workmanship. Sabbath is not fatigue-rest but God’s ceasing-from-creating; we enter that open Day as worship.

This claim rests on voice, not genre. From the bush that burns and is not consumed to the plains of Moab, the Author speaks, names, sends, and covenants. General revelation declares glory; special revelation declares what that glory is. Genesis opens the scroll — “In beginning …” — not as a timestamp but as prophetic invocation. Among many origin stories and older cosmogonies, Genesis stands as revelation: the Word that names the world and the human by God’s own speech. Christ binds His hearers to this voice — “If they do not listen to Moses, neither will they be persuaded though one should rise from the dead” — and the apostles concur: the prophetic word stands more sure, a lamp until daybreak. Ground zero is therefore the Beginning-Word: authority before analogy, revelation before comparison. Read from Moab, Genesis 1:1–2:4a does not invite “before/after” talk; it summons hearing within the seventh-day frame.

Flesh (bāśār) is covenantal gift — opened and closed by God, a side taken to form woman, joined again as “one flesh.” Estrangement later curves flesh inward into sarx; hence covenant is cut in flesh as both warning and promise of cure. Dust remains good ontology; flesh requires healing; sarx must die. Because the human is animated soil, vocation flows from soil-communion: serve and guard the adamah so that creation becomes worship. To image God is to mediate — representing God to creation and lifting creation’s praise to God. The land answers this priesthood: yielding to obedience, resisting rebellion, expelling covenant-breakers. At Moab this ground-zero charter is given to dust-people on the cusp of land: live as priests of earth and earth will sing; repeat Pharaoh and Babel and the land will vomit out. Crucially, none of this “adds” to creation: it consents to the finished form of God’s work and refuses the hubris of supplementing it.

In the fullness of time, God marries dust. Incarnation: the Word becomes flesh. Cross: the curses converge and are borne. Resurrection: the same body rises — dust glorified, scars retained as policy for the age to come. Human service (not ‘work’), therefore, has futures. Some labours are abiding — stitched into creation’s telos and so transfigured. Some are prototypes — holy rehearsals fulfilled at the wedding. Some are scaffolds — mercies for a wounded hour, thanked and laid down. Some are outlaw — industries of estrangement judged and ended. The sieve is Sabbath: what consents to God’s ceasing-fulfilled creation abides; what presumes to create its own world will not rise — there is no new ontology there to raise.

The software splinter belongs precisely here. Code is language ordered to manage distance, translate lack, and extend control; it is a bridge for absence, kin to knowledge-as-pursuit and tongues-as-translation. When communion is direct — when “we shall know fully, even as we are fully known” — the means yield to the end: pursuit ceases while possession remains; tongues fall silent while understanding abides; interfaces retire while communion endures (cf. the passing schema where “knowledge” and “tongues” cease, but love — communion — remains). Gardening, building, and the arts — earth-serving, place-making, praise — are abiding forms of priestly labour because they enact Adam’s ontology in public. Preaching as absence-bridge and coding as distance-bridge are mercies for now. The question is not dirt versus keys, but whether a given labour participates, not in ‘work’, but in being-human-as-animated-adamah — schooling bodies toward communion rather than catechising exile. Genesis answers because the Author speaks. And the Author’s answer begins and ends with melākâ: creation is God’s work; creatures are God’s works; vocation is the worship that serves and guards what God has finished.

Ground zero: Genesis at Moab

Every people tells origins. Empires chant cosmogonies; sages craft genealogies of meaning. None of that is despised here. Creation itself—skies declaring, soils instructing—testifies. But the claim at stake is more than testimony by things. It is testimony by God. The ground for anthropology is theology; the ground for teleology is revelation; the ground for revelation is the One who speaks. The wound is human, and so is the answer.
Hence Moab.

Revelation, not comparison, is first here—authority before analogy; the Voice that names us before any reading that weighs us.

The scroll that begins “In beginning…” ends its wilderness span with a colophon on the plains of Moab, by the Jordan at Jericho. Moses speaks; Moses writes; Moses deposits the book; Israel hears. The Torah is a single prophetic scroll—Genesis through Deuteronomy bound by voice and by place—delivered to a dust-people poised to inherit land. This is not an antiquarian assertion for the footnotes; it is the argumentative centre. Authority here is not the oldest myth but the living God who names Himself: YHWH Elohim, the Covenant LORD-Creator. The Author is the authority. The prophet is the bearer. The scroll is the medium. The people are addressed.

Why Genesis, then, and why there? Because the question beneath all late-modern angst—what is a human, what is meaning, what is vocation—is not first a sociological problem but a listening problem. If they will not listen to Moses, neither will they be persuaded by any later wonder, even a resurrection. The risen One Himself insisted that Moses wrote of Him; the apostolic witness calls the prophetic word more sure, a lamp until day dawns. It is not that genre is despised, but that genre bows to Voice. The city cannot be read without its foundation; the end cannot be read without its beginning.

“In beginning…” is not “in the beginning of time.” The Hebrew lacks the article—berēʾšît—“In beginning…,” the beginning of the scroll’s proclamation, not a timestamp. The opening line is the opening of a prophetic oracle: a revelation of God’s creative decree as covenantal summons. Day by day the pattern is call, separation, naming, blessing. “Let there be… and it was so… and God called… and God saw…”—ordinations more than annals. The sixth day climaxes in a world at peace: green food for all creatures, dominion without dread, no blood, no fear. Such a world has not yet been seen—in Eden, in biology, in history—therefore Genesis 1 is not a chronicle of what was but a revelation of what shall be under God: prophetic ontology, the seventh day’s promise declared from the beginning. It is the Sabbath world adumbrated—ceasing-fulfilled creation held open—day seven without evening, a promise framing Israel’s history as entry into God’s ceasing from creating.

The hinge to history is marked: “When no shrub had yet appeared… and there was no adam to serve the adamah… and YHWH Elohim had not yet caused it to rain…” (Gen 2:5). Here the generations, the “not yet,” begin. The garden is planted; the trees stand as twin futures—Life and the knowledge of good and evil; the serpent speaks; the adam is summoned to priestly service and vigilance. The verbs already aim at soil: serve the adamah, guard the sanctuary-garden—priesthood first, kingship by derivation. The breach that follows is not a cosmic fall but a covenant failure and forfeit, an eastward sending-away. Two divorces occur at once: human from human; human from land. Thorns answer estranged hands. East of Eden begins. But even this contested history unfolds inside the seventh-day frame: God does not resume creating; He ceases and indwells, sustaining His world by presence, not production.

Moab retrieves that beginning to interpret Israel’s now. The same verbs reappear: serve (ʿābad) and keep (šāmar). They were temple verbs long before there was a tabernacle because the garden already was sanctuary. Adam was priest before he was king; Israel, a kingdom of priests before she was a nation among nations. Dominion is reframed as priesthood. Being (dust animated) grounds doing (image and priest). Image is office of mediation—bearing God’s blessing to the ground and bearing the ground’s praise to God. Land is not backdrop; land is covenant partner. It yields or resists according to the people’s priesthood. This is not romantic agrarianism; it is covenantal reciprocity lodged in revelation. And the law encodes Sabbath as the public memory of melākâ ceased—limits, fallows, releases—justice shaped like God’s own ceasing.

Authority matters because without it everything collapses into preference. Moab is ground zero not because it is early but because it is where God’s speech is given to a people who must learn to live on land without becoming Pharaoh or building Babel. Genesis is told there so that entry into inheritance will not reproduce Egypt’s machinery or Babel’s towers. Genesis is God’s why to Israel’s how; the origin that authorises the ethic; the ontology that grounds the vocation. Only on this ground can late-modern labours—software among them—be weighed for communion or exile.

Special revelation does not erase general revelation; it names it. The heavens tell glory, but the scroll tells who and what that glory is. Skies can instruct that there is order; the scroll reveals the order’s Giver and the human’s place within it. So the ontology stated plain—humanity as Spirit-breathed dust, priestly image for the adamah—is not inferred from soils but received from speech. Named first, then narrated; ontology first, then vocation. The same scroll also names flesh—bāśār—not as shame but as covenantal gift: opened and closed by God to fashion the woman; sung over as “flesh of my flesh”; joined as one flesh. Only later is flesh corrupted into sarx—estrangement in a body—hence the covenant sign cut in flesh, a pledge that flesh awaits cure. The prophetic authority is the difference between a world guessed at and a world named. And the name over the whole is melākâ: God’s ceasing-fulfilled creating, within which human labour consents to serve and guard.

From Moab the prophets read the beginning forward. Isaiah’s peaceable mountain is not decorative poetry; it is Genesis 1’s day-six world come of age. “Dust shall be the serpent’s food” is not zoology but the confinement of rebellion under the reign of the Child. Isaiah 34 and 35 are twin inheritances—wilderness allotted to beasts that refuse God; a highway of holiness where the redeemed walk—both already adumbrated in Cain and Seth. The prophetic witness does not reinterpret Genesis; it remembers it. Their futures are Genesis’ seventh day ripening, not revision.

The Christ receives the same scroll and fulfills it rather than abolishing it. He is the Word by whom creation is spoken; the Seed promised; the Priest-King who serves by washing feet; the Bridegroom whose opened side gives a people. He marries dust—Incarnation. He gathers the curses—thorns, sweat, nakedness, blood to ground. He rises—dust glorified, same body, scars intact. Scars retained as policy for the age to come. Without Moses, even this would be misread. With Moses, it is the promised hinge where exile turns to homecoming. In Him we see the pattern entire: God’s melākâ completed; God’s ceasing confessed; God’s presence enthroning creation — Sabbath as reign, not rest.

Therefore the late-modern questions of labour, technology, and meaning must be set on this ground. Labour is discerned by its telos: does it serve communion or catechise exile? Preaching is scaffold while absence persists; gardening abides as priestly care for land; medicine is mercy amid mortality; empire that commodifies bodies reenacts Solomon’s bureaucracy and Babel’s quota-brick. These judgments are not vibes; they are warranted by the Author’s speech. Abiding, prototypes, scaffolds, and outlaws are not market categories but covenant ones. Human labour’s futures—abiding, prototypes, scaffolds, outlaws—are determined by revelation’s ontology and eschatology, not by market cycles. And the eschatology is explicitly seventh-day: “there remains a Sabbath-ceasing for the people of God.” The Day has begun to dawn; it has not yet closed.

Moab, then, is not parochial. It is universal because it is divine. Dust-people from every nation stand under the same Voice. The scroll’s opening, “In beginning…,” is the lamp until the day when Sabbath dawns without evening. The end is read from the beginning; the beginning is read in the light of the end. Ground zero is here because God spoke here. And because God spoke here, the human knows what the human is for: to serve and to guard, to image and to intercede, to marry the ground in fidelity until the Bride is revealed and the land inhales.

Hello, Dust. Here is the why beneath every how; the Author beneath every authority; the word that names the world and the labour within it. Next, the five words that hold the world together: Dust. Ground. Image. Serve-Guard. Flesh. And after them — or rather around them — the seventh: melākâ, God’s alone.

Excursus — Genesis 2:1–3 (“triad of doublets”)

Genesis 2:1–3 closes what 1:1 began: a judicial cadence of completion. “He finished… He finished; He ceased… He ceased.” Each doublet seals ownership. Melākâ belongs to God alone — His creative labour now ceased, blessed, and sanctified. The seventh day is not divine idleness but divine indwelling: God ceases from creating and fills what He has made.

Thus Sabbath = ceasing-from-creating, not fatigue-rest. God’s melākâ is holy, unshareable; Adam’s life is latreuō — priestly service and guarding inside the finished. Humanity does not “work for” God but consents to God’s completed work through faithful labour that serves and guards the given world.

Excursus — Genesis 2:4 (“toledoth”)

“These are the generations…” marks not a sequel but an interior unfolding. The toledoth opens not a chronological sequel but an interior unfolding — anthropology inside Sabbath. Genesis 1:1 and 2:1–3 form one revelation; 2:4 begins its covenantal anthropology. The verbs of human life — form, breathe, place, serve, guard — all occur within divine ceasing, not after it.

Therefore, “serve and guard” are not post-Edenic tasks but the creature’s ordinary vocation inside divine ceasing — vocation without co-creation. The seventh day remains open; humanity lives within its holiness, not outside or beyond it.

Bridge — Hebrews 3–4 and the open Day

Hebrews reads the seventh day as unfinished entry: “There remains a Sabbath-ceasing for the people of God.” Justification is ceasing-from-works; vocation is serving-and-guarding; both are Sabbath-shaped because God alone works (melākâ). The promise still stands: to enter His ceasing.
To believe is to stop producing worlds and to begin inhabiting God’s.

Bridge — Adam within Covenant

Adam is first-Abraham and first-Moses: called within the finished world, commissioned to serve and guard, blessed with promise and curse alike. He does not “continue creation”; he consents — animated dust placed as priest of the ground. Genesis 2 is covenant, not chronology; vocation, not manufacture. The covenant pattern — voice, name, gift, command, blessing, curse — begins with him.

Bridge — “Sabbath Economics”

Limit is the moral shape of praise. Economies that refuse limit grind dust into bricks; economies that honour limit let labour become doxology. Sabbath memory (melākâ-ceased) governs justice, mercy, release, and rest — the social form of God’s ceasing.

Human labour either consents to divine melākâ or imitates Pharaoh’s machinery; there is no neutral labour.

Remember the Seventh (Sabbath)

“God blesses the seventh day and sanctifies it, for in it He has ceased from all His work which God had created for making.” To remember this and keep it holy means we say “ceasing-from-creating,” never “resting from work.” We avoid before/after language across Gen 1:1–2:4a — use within / from / inside. We reserve “work” univocally for God unless marked as “human labour/service.” We treat “flesh” (bāśār / sarx) along the covenant axis: dust → flesh → sarx → flesh-healed. We pair dominion = priesthood; productivity = Sabbath. We keep “fall” = failure/forfeit, eastward sending-away; or better: the fault was not a fall but a failure to rise and a forfeited prospect of attaining life.

Genesis Grammar

What follows is human grammar gathered within the seventh day: six words of being spoken under the Word of melākâ completed and ceased.

Dust. Ground. Image. Serve-Guard. Flesh. All live inside the open holiness of God’s ceasing.
Work (melākâ). God alone works—creating and ceasing-from-creating.

These are the words that hold the world together—the grammar of being before history began to fray. The scroll of Genesis does not begin with mythic machinery or cosmic diagrams; it begins with speech. Every word is vocation, every naming a covenant act. Before there were nations or liturgies, there was dust and breath, ground and gift, image and priesthood—six words of human ontology spoken within a seventh, the divine word of completed work. These six are anthropological; the seventh is theological. This grammar is revelation, not discovery—the same Voice creating (general beginning) and revealing (special beginning) being into order. Together they form the grammar of ontology that births all vocation: being before doing, worship before labour. And the order is deliberate: the human six live inside the divine seventh, for ontology and vocation are enclosed by God’s own work.

Dust (ʿāphār): ontology, not mortality
“And YHWH Elohim formed the adam from the dust of the adamah and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the adam became a living soul.” The verse is not autopsy but liturgy. In Eden, dust is not death—it is essence. The creature’s very being is earth-born and Spirit-filled, woven of matter and miracle. “From dust you are” is not curse but constitution; only later, when the bond breaks, does the sentence “to dust you shall return” become judgment.

Dust is not devaluation. It is the confession that humanity is creaturely, not divine, and that this creatureliness is glory. The dust-body is the medium through which Spirit acts; the earth-body is the instrument through which heaven speaks. To be dust is to be dependent, relational, and placed. Adam’s life is neither self-possessed nor autonomous—it is breathed. And when Paul later speaks of the “spiritual body,” he does not mean immaterial; he means dust fully animated by Spirit—creation transfigured, not replaced.

Thus dust, as substance, never requires cleansing; it awaits liberation—resurrection—when Spirit’s animation is without remainder. Dust does not need sweeping; it needs raising. Its salvation is not soap but Spirit.

Ground / Land (adamah): covenant partner, not backdrop
The adam is formed from adamah and for adamah. The same word ties human and habitat. The relationship is not utilitarian but nuptial. The ground is not scenery but spouse. In Eden, this bond is without shame: the soil yields gladly to hands that serve it, and humanity delights in its fertility. When Genesis says that there was “no adam to serve the adamah,” it defines humanity’s vocation before any command is given. Service precedes sovereignty.

After the failure/forfeit and eastward sending-away, this same reciprocity turns judicial. The land “no longer yields,” and later in Torah, it “vomits out” the disobedient. The land participates in covenant. It responds to worship and to violence. Blood cries from it; sabbaths heal it; jubilee frees it. The adamah is the first witness and last testifier. Hence exile is always eastward—away from the ground’s blessing into uncreation. The covenant of soil and soul is not metaphor but marriage—the first union God blessed before the making of flesh from flesh.

Israel’s life in the land therefore rehearses Adam’s priesthood writ large: fidelity yields fertility; idolatry severs communion and expels. The land’s fruitfulness is Israel’s doxology made agricultural.

Image (ṣelem): representation, not replacement
“Let us make adam in our image, after our likeness.” These are royal terms, not metaphysical abstractions. In the ancient world, kings set up images of themselves at the edges of their realms to signify delegated authority. Genesis baptises that concept and reverses its idolatry: the true God makes living images, not statues, to extend His care, not His coercion.

The image is not a capacity but a commission. To image God is to act in His stead toward creation—to rule as He rules, which is to serve; to speak as He speaks, which is to bless; to shape as He shapes, which is to give form without violence. To image is to intercede—the visible mediation of invisible blessing. Every distortion of the image is a distortion of dominion: exploitation, domination, commodification. Every healing of the image is a renewal of priestly stewardship.

Image, therefore, is vocational ontology: a being-given office that mediates God’s blessing to the adamah and returns the adamah’s praise to God. Image is vocation before it is capacity: authority as intercession, power as blessing.

Serve and Guard (ʿābad and šāmar): priestly verbs
These two verbs first appear in Genesis 2:15: “YHWH Elohim took the adam and put him in the garden of Eden to serve it and to guard it.” Both verbs recur in Numbers for the Levitical priesthood: to serve (ʿābad) in the tabernacle and to guard (šāmar) its sanctity. The garden is the prototype sanctuary; the human is its first priest.

To serve is to labour as worship; to guard is to protect holiness. Together they define humanity’s calling not as exploitation of resources but as mediation between Creator and creation. The hands that till the soil are the same hands that offer sacrifice; the posture of service is the posture of prayer.

When humanity ceases to serve and guard, the garden becomes wilderness. When Israel ceases to serve and guard, the land becomes exile. Yet these verbs are not rescinded. They are renewed in the Son of Man who serves unto death and guards the sheep with His life. From these verbs unfold every labour—abiding, prototype, scaffold, or outlaw—each tested by whether it tends God’s finished work or tries to add to it.

Their criterion is Sabbath: service that blesses the finished, and guardianship that refuses to supplement God’s melākâ. True service refuses to supplement God’s melākâ; true guarding refuses to improve on the finished.

Flesh (bāśār): covenant in the body
“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh”—the first human words recorded in Scripture are poetry of recognition. Flesh here is not sinful stuff but covenantal medium: relation made visible. The man and woman stand unashamed because their flesh is communion, not commodity. Flesh is the visible interface where Spirit-animated dust becomes present to another—union rendered touchable, speech made body.

Dust is substance; flesh is relation. Estrangement corrupts the latter, not the former. After estrangement, the judgment is ontological before it is penal: Scripture names the breach not as a flaw in dust but as a covenantal repudiation: “all flesh had corrupted its way.” Flesh, created as the medium of communion, now stands excommunicant—a presence against presence. Desire is the culprit—not mere selfishness, but “goodishness”: coveting the gifts as the Good, seeking blessing without the Blesser, fruit without fidelity. Thus the communicative bond fails; the partner departs; the one-flesh covenant is contradicted in essence. This is not a light “bending” but an ontological breach—like a branch repudiating the vine, withering by its own refusal of life.

Because the wound is covenantal, God inscribes promise in the same medium that now bears estrangement. Circumcision in the flesh marks belonging, and prophetic hope promises a new heart of flesh. Under the old covenant, water cleansed symbolically; under the new, the Holy Spirit cleanses effectively—renewing flesh for fidelity. Dust remains good substance awaiting liberation; flesh, as relational interface, requires cleansing and renewal; sarx must die so bāśār may be healed. Flesh is both wound and witness: the place where estrangement is confessed and reconciliation begun.

In Christ the Word becomes flesh—bāśār assumed without sin; sarx (flesh-in-corruption) judged and put to death, then raised. The body that sinned is the body that is saved. His resurrection does not unmake flesh; it unveils its final purpose: to be fully Spirit-animated—transparent to communion, touch without corruption, matter suffused with glory; the same body, scars now covenant signs. The Word that spoke these first names later took flesh: grammar incarnate, covenant perfected.

Work (melākâ): the grammar of God’s labour and ceasing
Work is both first and last, alpha and omega of the scroll’s opening. “In beginning, God created”—and “God completes by the seventh day His work which He has made, and ceases by the seventh day from all His work which He has made.” Genesis 1:1 and 2:1–3 are not two moments but one revelation seen from two poles: the end in the beginning, the beginning fulfilled in the end. The creation account is not a six-day history but a seven-day prophecy—the seventh day being not “rest” as fatigue but creation’s own completion, its end, its sanctified perfection. This is ceasing-from-creating: God’s last creative deed is to cease creating. The Sabbath is His finishing word, the consecration of limit, the holiness of “enough.”

And this seventh day is future-open: it is not past but promised. It is the day that has no evening and no morning because it has not yet closed. The work of forming and filling has ceased, but the world still waits to enter that day. The Sabbath remains open—the eternal Day toward which all generations move, the age of fulfilment glimpsed from the beginning. “There remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God,” says Hebrews; the Day of God’s ceasing still draws all creation forward, even as it already frames all being. It is both the horizon and the atmosphere of existence: the future that encloses the present, the end from which the beginning was spoken.

Elohim alone works. Work belongs to God because power belongs to God; only God acts. Creation is not a relic of what God once did but the visibility of what God does now. His works are His presence in extension, His invisible life made visible through motion, sound, and being. “God saw that it was good” is not moral approval but ontological revelation: goodness is the visibility of divine working. The heavens declare the glory of God not as poets, but as phenomena—what exists is what God is doing. To see creation is to see God at work. Everything that is, is one of His works.

Adam, therefore, cannot work. He cannot add, create, give, or perform anything for God. He is not the worker but the workmanship—dust animated by breath, one of God’s works among God’s works. His very presence is God’s activity made conscious. The Spirit who moves the waters also moves the man; his life is not independent action but the living visibility of divine animation. Adam’s vocation—to serve and to keep—is not work in God’s sense; it is participation in the already finished. He tends what God has ceased to create. His being is worship, his serving the Spirit’s movement within him. To be human is to be God’s work working—Spirit-animated dust through which God continues to care for His creation.

Thus the Sabbath reveals both the separation and the union of Creator and creation. God’s melākâ is holy—His alone, set apart, unshareable. To cease from creating is to declare that all things belong to God and none to themselves. Yet in that ceasing, God also indwells His works: His Spirit, who hovered in the beginning, now fills what He has finished. The Breath that once formed and filled now rests to indwell. Creation continues, not as new making, but as divine sustaining; not as production, but as presence. God is immanent precisely as the One-who-has-ceased-creating: His ceasing-from-creating is His reign.

Adam exists inside that reign. He exists not before it, nor after it, but inside it. His service of the adamah is God’s own work through him, the divine care made visible in covenant partnership. The inanimate dust serves God unknowingly; the evil one unwillingly; Adam serves knowingly, willingly, joyfully—animated dust become conscious priest. His vocation is not to make the world better but to bless what God has made, to guard what God has finished, to act as the living amen to God’s creative Word.

Therefore, the seventh day is both first and last, beginning and end. “In beginning” declares the same mystery as “by the seventh day God completed His work.” Genesis 1:2–2:3 is the unrolling of Genesis 1:1—the prophetic unveiling of creation as divine labour reaching its End. In that End, God’s ceasing is His enthronement: His dwelling among His works, His glory resting upon all He has made. Creation is complete, yet history continues; the promise is declared, yet not entered. The Sabbath remains the open horizon of time, the day toward which all days lean.

Here lies the grammar of divine labour: God alone works; creation is His work; Adam is His workmanship; the Spirit is His working presence; and the Sabbath is His ceasing—His declaration that creation is full. From this grammar all human vocation proceeds. We do not create; we consent. We do not achieve; we adore. Our labour begins within the finished, tending the one world God has made until the end reveals again the beginning—until creation, God’s work, rests wholly in God.

Excursus — you shall return; your hope is death
“You are dust, and to dust you shall return.” This is not condemnation but revelation — salvation through judgment; hope buried in death, like a dormant seed awaiting spring. The sentence is not loss but prophecy, tautology before penalty: to return to dust is to return to being as you are — dust animated by the Breath of God. What God pronounces as judgment is already promise: that what He has once breathed He will breathe again.

In grasping at godhood, Adam became beast-breathed, serpent-animated, hubris-filled; in returning to dust he will, through death, be raised — Breath-born being once more. What sounds like an ending is the beginning heard again: repentance as re-creation, death as the curse turned blessing, judgment as the door to life restored. To make this chiastic movement more explicit, this is: judgment → death → life → dust → breath.

Adam’s judgment is his hope: not to escape dust but to be restored to it — to return to being; to enter God’s ceasing-from-creating, and in that ceasing, to recover worklessness — to do what dust does best: dance in the wind, Spirit-borne. For dust’s destiny is not decay but participation: the humble ontology through which God breathes His glory.

This declaration of judgment sows its own promise: what God imbued with breath will breathe again. Death itself is midwife to resurrection.

Hello, Dust. Cease from creating; consent to being created. Return to dust — repent to your being — that Breath may raise you.

Grammar gathered
Dust names what humanity is; ground names where humanity belongs; image names whom humanity represents; serve and guard name what humanity does; flesh names how humanity relates; work names what God has finished and entrusted. This is the syntax of being human within a completed creation. When any term is isolated or denied, meaning collapses.

Modern confusion about vocation and body, ecology and economy, is grammatical before it is moral. We have forgotten how to speak this sentence. Theology must recover grammar before ethics can recover coherence.

Genesis gives the vocabulary; revelation gives the accent. To reread creation through this grammar is to relearn our mother tongue. The Spirit still broods over dust, teaching articulation. The Word still speaks through the prophets and apostles, forming syntax out of chaos.

Hello, Dust. Breathe. Speak again the language of beginnings and of endings made one. And keep the order straight: anthropology within theology, the six within the seventh.

The Ancient Near East (ANE) and Moab Horizon

The plains of Moab are not mythic air but historical ground—where dust meets law, and covenant marries soil. Here, Israel stands in hearing of the nations’ old songs: Babylon’s Enuma Elish, Egypt’s Memphite Theology, Canaan’s Baal cycle, Mesopotamia’s Atrahasis and Gilgamesh. Every empire carried its own origin liturgy, its own telling of sky, sea, and man. The world was teeming with beginnings.

Moses does not enter the contest as another bard. He stands as prophet of revelation, not poet of speculation. The Voice that called him from the bush now speaks creation into covenantal grammar. The God who called him from the bush is not a character among gods; He is the Voice that makes worlds by speech—the One who is I AM. At Moab, the Name is disclosed: the same Elohim of creation now revealed as YHWH Elohim of covenant—Creator become Covenant Lord. Israel hears that the world is not divine but declared, not eternal matter but creation ex nihilo, not ruled by rival powers but sustained by a single will. Genesis is polemic and covenant together—polemic against empire’s myth of autonomy, covenant for dust-people called to serve and guard.

The ancient world sang of violence birthing order. The deep was chaos, tamed by blade or decree. Creation was conquest; humanity, conscript. Genesis overturns this grammar: no corpses of slain gods, no bloody enthronement scenes. The waters are separated, not slain. Darkness is bounded, not battled. Creation comes by blessing, not war. Humanity is formed, not manufactured—spoken into being by Breath, not pressed into service by fear. The world is spoken, not spilled.

At Moab, this contrast becomes commission. Israel is to dwell in land without copying empire’s myth or method. Egypt built its order through forced labour; Babel reached heaven through uniformity; Canaan secured fertility through blood. Israel’s order will rest on Sabbath—creation’s own pulse of ceasing and communion. Its fertility will depend on obedience, not sorcery. Its security will depend on trust, not armies. Each alternative myth promises autonomy; Torah insists on dependence.

Moses’ retelling of beginnings is therefore not preface but law in narrative form. “In beginning…” is the first commandment unfolded in story: You shall have no other gods before Me. Genesis tells why that is true—because there are no other gods, only creatures. The sun, moon, and stars are not deities but lamps. The sea is not divine chaos but bounded habitat. The human is not a slave of heaven but its priest on earth, animated dust within the finished work of God’s ceasing-from-creating.

Every verse of Genesis thus carries double weight—cosmic and covenantal. “Let there be light” is both history’s dawn and Israel’s vocation: to live as light among nations. “Be fruitful and multiply” is both creation’s blessing and Abraham’s promise. “Rule and subdue” becomes “serve and keep.” At Moab, these ancient words find local flesh. Dust-people are summoned to tend dust-land under divine Word—revealing to the nations what a world looks like when ruled by blessing instead of fear, Sabbath instead of striving.

General revelation still whispers through the patterns of nature—the ordered heavens, the seasons’ return, the bond between soil and breath—but only this scroll names the Speaker. To know creation truly is to know its Author; to hear the Voice is to inhabit the seventh day. The prophet does not abolish what the stars declare; he teaches their language.

Israel is thus placed in a corridor of revelation: behind them the ancient world’s myths, before them the land of promise, within them the living law. Genesis opens their eyes to see the land not as prize but as partner; their bodies not as property but as temple; their service not as burden but as worship. Moab becomes ground zero for understanding both anthropology and ecology, ontology and vocation.

The voice that spoke from the bush now writes in dust: Before you labour, know what you are; before you inherit, remember whose you are. The prophet names creation so that the people can dwell within it rightly. This is why Genesis, why Moses, why Moab—because without revelation, the world is a riddle without answer; with revelation, it is a covenant waiting to be kept.

This is why Genesis at Moab is not preface but charter; not museum, but marching orders.
Hello, Dust. Listen to the Voice that made the earth your home—and within whose ceasing you are called to serve and guard.

Marriage to the Land — Covenant Reciprocity, Not Metaphor

Adam is formed from the adamah and for it; humanity’s first relationship is not to another human but to the ground. The text does not give metaphor but matrimony. Genesis speaks of a covenant of creation, a bond of mutual belonging. “No adam was yet to serve the adamah,” the scroll says, before the rain had fallen. The phrase means not that the earth lacked a worker, but that creation awaited its priest—the one who would receive and return blessing.

This is the primal marriage. The earth yields life to the human; the human offers service and praise to the earth’s Maker. The Breath of God is the vow; dust and Spirit are joined in covenant until death do them part. When estrangement ruptures that union, it is double divorce. Humanity hides from God and turns on the soil. The ground, once fertile with delight, now answers estrangement with thorns. The labourer sweats; the field resists. This is not arbitrary penalty but reciprocity broken—failure and forfeit within covenant, not cosmological collapse. And the remedy is not hyper-productivity but Sabbath: ceasing that consents to God’s melākâ, re-teaching the land to breathe and belong within divine ceasing.

Israel inherits the same pattern. At Moab the covenant is renewed, and the marriage vows are repeated: if the people love and serve YHWH, the heavens will give rain and the earth its increase; if they turn to idols, the land will close its womb. “The land will vomit you out,” Moses says—not as curse invented but as consequence enacted. The land keeps covenant even when people break it; its obedience outlasts ours. It remains faithful by enforcing judgment.

This is not romantic agrarianism. The land is not a goddess, nor humanity her equal. It is covenantal partnership under God. The adamah is servant and witness, not deity. The soil is a witness to worship. Every harvest is liturgy; every drought is sermon. Israel’s festivals trace this rhythm: Passover at planting, Pentecost at first fruits, Tabernacles at ingathering. Each season preaches fidelity: bless, and be blessed; exploit, and be expelled. Sabbath years and Jubilee institutionalise God’s ceasing as social justice: fields rest, debts release, slaves go free—creation rearranged by the seventh-day grammar.

Hence the prophets later call idolatry “adultery” because false worship always includes ecological infidelity. When Israel bows to Baal for rain, she breaks her marriage vows with YHWH. The rivers mourn, the hills languish, and the land grieves under human unfaithfulness. Sin is idolatry, and idolatry always distorts creation’s liturgy: desiring gifts as the Good, consuming what should be received. The healing of creation must therefore include the repentance of its priest.

Christ comes as Bridegroom to restore that marriage. Born of a woman and laid in a manger, He is the Dust-born marrying dust again. His miracles are nuptial signs: water turned to wine, bread multiplied from ground’s yield, bodies healed by touch. At the cross, His blood falls to the earth—the bride price paid in red clay. In resurrection, the covenant is renewed. The same dust rises glorified; the same ground groans in labour awaiting adoption. Heaven and earth, once estranged, are betrothed anew in Him. His enthroned ceasing is the Father’s Sabbath made visible: divine melākâ completed, now indwelling in glory.

To serve and to guard the land, then, is to live within that reconciliation. It is priestly fidelity, not nostalgia. Every act of care, every restraint from greed, every Sabbath fallow, every shared meal, is a renewal of vows. “The land is Mine,” says YHWH Elohim, “and you are strangers and sojourners with Me.” Ownership gives way to belonging; possession yields to participation. Dominion becomes priesthood. The true dominion is tenderness—the hand that cultivates without clutching, the heart that rejoices without exploiting. This is dominion that refuses to supplement God’s work and instead blesses what God has finished.

To despise the soil is to despise the self, for both are animated dust. To remember dust is to remember covenant. Every footprint is a liturgical act, every furrow a confession, every harvest a hymn. The Spirit-breathed earth waits for sons and daughters who will serve her rightly—who will till as priests, not as Pharaohs; who will guard as lovers, not as lords.

Hello, Dust. Be faithful to your first spouse; cease striving to possess and consent again to belong.

Dominion That Bows — Priesthood, Not Possession

“Have dominion,” God said, “and subdue the earth.” For centuries this line has been read as license, yet Genesis itself defines its limits. Dominion is framed by blessing, not by conquest; by service, not by seizure. The verbs serve and guard precede rule and subdue — as root before branch, ontology before vocation. Dominion is derivative; the human reigns only as image, never as source. Dominion therefore adds nothing to creation; it consents to God’s finishing melākâ and mediates blessing within it.

To bear God’s image is to exercise authority that mirrors His own: creative, life-giving, self-emptying. The Creator rules by speaking life into being; the creature rules by cultivating what is given — never by supplementing what God finishes. God’s rule orders chaos; human rule must order without coercion. The first dominion is gardening — priestly service of shaping habitat for life.

When dominion forgets priesthood, it collapses into empire. Pharaoh’s Egypt was the first parody of Eden: brick quotas instead of fruitfulness, labour without Sabbath, production without praise. Babylon repeats the pattern with a tower in place of a tree. Dominion divorced from service becomes domination.

Moses warns Israel: “When you enter the land, you shall not multiply horses or gold or wives.” Dominion must not revert to Pharaoh’s logic of accumulation. Kingship in Israel is conditional upon Torah — law above ruler, covenant above crown. When Solomon forgets this, wisdom hardens into bureaucracy, the temple becomes tax office, and bodies become labour force. The dust-people are turned again to bricks. At the root of that failure is Sabbath forfeited — refusal of divine ceasing-from-creating, and with it, the return of endless production.

Christ restores dominion by inversion. He is the last Adam, yet He kneels. “The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve.” His sceptre is a towel; His throne, a cross. In Him, dominion bows — ruling by blessing, conquering by mercy. He gathers the scattered authority of humanity and returns it to its source. Dominion becomes doxology again. His kingship is Sabbath-shaped: authority as rest-giving, not task-setting; presence as indwelling, not extraction.

All labour is tested by this pattern. Governance, business, technology, art — each can be priestly or idolatrous. The measure is simple: does it serve communion or secure control? Does it guard the weak or grasp for power? Dominion that bows becomes worship; dominion that seizes becomes violence. The difference is not in the tools but in the posture of the heart.

Resurrection vindicates this humility. “The meek shall inherit the earth.” Dominion is not abolished but redeemed. The future of authority is gentleness — the rule of the gardener, not the general; the strength that serves, not subdues.

Hello, Dust. Rule as one who kneels.

The First Sending-Away — East of Eden

Exile is not afterthought; it is the liturgy that closes the first covenant — the eastward sending-away. The man and the woman are sent eastward, the ground cursed, the garden sealed. Yet even here mercy hides in judgment. To bar the way to the tree of life is to prevent the perpetuation of death. Mortality is the mercy (creatures never possessed immortality as possession) that interrupts eternal estrangement.

The curse unfolds in two fractures: human from human — desire turned to domination; and human from land — soil turned to toil. The very words of creation are reversed: “serve and guard” become “sweat and thorn” (not melākâ). The creature who once blessed the earth now drains it. The land that once yielded gladly now resists. Exile is not punishment from outside; it is the inevitable consequence of a broken bond. Failure and forfeit, not a metaphysical “fall,” shape this eastward liturgy. And still, God’s seventh-day stance holds: He has ceased from creating; He has not ceased from sustaining the exiles, clothing them in skins, preserving the seed, keeping time toward the promised Day.

Still, God clothes them. The first shedding of blood covers their shame. Even east of Eden, grace sows seeds. Every altar that follows is a faint echo of that covering, every covenant a promise of return.
Israel’s story mirrors Adam’s. Adam is first-Abraham and first-Moses; possession of land depends on faithfulness; exile follows betrayal. From Canaan to Babylon, the pattern holds. Yet through every sending-away runs a thread of hope: prophets foretell a day when the wilderness will bloom, when the exiles will come home, when dust will sing again.

In Christ, the exiled priest returns — the Priest-King, dust glorified —. Thorns crown His brow; sweat mingles with blood; the ground receives the price of reconciliation. At His rising, the tomb becomes garden — firstfruits of the land’s healing —. The Cherub’s sword is sheathed. The gate opens westward again. The Gardener walks among the trees.

Every Eucharist is a homecoming, every confession a step toward the gate — Sabbath entering. The curse that once expelled now propels redemption. Humanity learns again to dwell as dust beloved, not dust despised.

Hello, Dust. The east wind will not have the final word.

Revelation and rivalry—The ANE and Moab Horizon continued

In the ancient imagination, to tell origins was to define destiny. The world’s oldest civilizations built not only temples but timelines — cosmic genealogies to justify their power. Babylon’s Marduk slew Tiamat to make the world; Pharaoh claimed birth from the sun; the king’s rule was divine because creation itself was hierarchical. The world began in violence, and so it must be ruled by it.

Moses writes against this mythology not as historian or philosopher but as prophet. His revelation is the antithesis of empire. Where Babylon crowns kings to control, YHWH crowns dust to serve. Where Egypt builds pyramids to ascend, YHWH descends to speak. Genesis is a dismantling of every theology of control — a word from the One who is free, calling a people to freedom under law, granting dominion by blessing and consent, never by supplementing what God finishes.

In Enuma Elish, humanity is created from the blood of a slain god to relieve divine labour — a slave race, bred for drudgery. Genesis says the opposite: humanity is the royal image of God, not servant of divine fatigue but priest of divine joy. In the myths, the gods cease because mortals labour; in Genesis, God ceases from creating because creation is complete, and humanity is invited into that ceasing. Sabbath is rebellion against every economy of exhaustion. And biblically, “rest” means God’s ceasing-from-creating, not divine inactivity — enthronement presence, not absence.

At Moab, these truths are not speculative — they are pastoral. Israel is poised between empires and must decide whose world it inhabits. The wilderness has stripped them of Egypt’s myths; Canaan’s fertility cults beckon ahead. Genesis is given to teach them how to live on land without turning land into god or neighbour into resource. It reveals that soil is not a commodity but covenant; labour/service is not slavery but worship.

This is why Moses stands as more than a tribal lawgiver. Since Adam, he is the first of his sons to speak with YHWH God unveiled, face to face, and live. The bush burns yet is not consumed — the cosmos aflame with Presence. The One who speaks does not compete with creation; He indwells it. From that fire, YHWH calls, “I have come down to deliver.” All revelation flows from that descent.

The same Voice that names Himself in Exodus writes Himself into Genesis. Creation is spoken with the same verbs that will later describe redemption: And God said… and it was so. The word that made the world is the word that makes Israel. The revelation of I AM is retroactive; it reaches back through time to interpret the beginning. Genesis is read not from the garden outward but from the bush backward. The same God who calls Moses by name is the One who called light from darkness.

So Genesis is not a preface but the first chapter of covenant. It is written so that a liberated people will not enslave again; so that a people fed by manna will not forget who sends rain; so that priests of the land will not become its Pharaohs. The theology of Moab is the antidote to the theology of empire. Therefore Israel’s public life must be Sabbath-shaped: ceasing that refuses empire’s endless production; limits that confess God’s finished melākâ; jubilee that anticipates the still-open seventh day.

And it is still the antidote now. The modern myths of self-creation, progress, and human sovereignty are retellings of the same story in digital syntax. The gods have changed names, but the grammar remains: autonomy as divinity, production as salvation, control as peace. The revelation of YHWH still answers: the world is not self-made; the human is not self-owning; labour is not self-justifying. “You are dust, and to dust you shall return” — not threat, but truth that liberates.

Every philosophy that forgets that sentence ends in exhaustion or exploitation. Every technology that refuses it becomes Babel rebuilt. To hear Genesis again is to remember the covenant that frees labour/service from slavery and dominion from domination.

The burning bush still speaks. The Voice still calls creation by name. Moab is not only ancient geography — it is every threshold where humans stand between revelation and myth, between grace and empire, between Sabbath and endless production. The dust still waits for those who will listen.
Hello, Dust. Take off your shoes — the ground is holy.

Physis and Sarx — Two Words for One War

The Hebrew scroll ends where Adam ended: with Israel’s death and Jewish exile; the Greek letters begin in juxtaposition: with incarnation, beginning a new beginning. Between them lies flesh asunder; dust striving against the Breath that animates it.

The genesis of flesh (bāśār) was covenantal — Adam himself was cut and closed with flesh to create new flesh for union; naked skin was the medium of this communion: his unbroken bone was given for the life of his bride—her flesh was new, raised from the dust to clothe his side with his own body: they were ontologically one flesh—like a Willow branch, that, broken from the trunk, shoots in the ground, the new tree is the old tree born again. It was Adam’s flesh that opened and was closed, that took and was corrupted, that was covered and died; and Eve, built from Adam’s side, is “the mother of all living.” The “unbroken bones” motif belongs to the later pattern fulfilled in the Messiah, not to Adam.

The failure of Genesis 3 was not a fall from life but the forfeit of its prospect through infidelity to the very breath that provided it. Death was not a punishment but an ontological truth; dust falls back to the ground when the wind drops it. By Genesis 6, “all flesh had corrupted its way” with infidelity, and the seed of desire, first buried in flesh when Adam ate what his hands had taken from God to gain what is God’s to give, had now grown and born sons who take the blood of their brothers and their daughters for their beds.

By the time of Paul, the Greek world names this corruption sarx — flesh against the grain, dust defying the Breath, creation resisting the Creator who gives order to the physis. And it names the grain, the order, physis (which we translate ‘nature’) — and this ‘natural’ order is good; it is dust animated by Breath, uncorrupted by sarx — flesh estranged — physis disordered.

When Paul says “creation was subjected to futility,” he echoes Genesis 3 (failure/forfeit, not a metaphysical “fall”). When he writes that “the creation itself will be liberated,” he carries forward Deuteronomy’s promise: the land will rest when sons and daughters are revealed. The vocabulary shifts, but the covenant remains. Romans 8 is Moab in Greek — dust awaiting breath. And its horizon is explicitly seventh-day: the creation’s freedom arrives as participation in God’s ceasing-fulfilled reign, not as the start of a second creation project.

In the resurrection of Christ, the grammar of both languages resolves. The Word becomes flesh, not to escape it but to sanctify it. The tomb’s dust is not discarded; it is glorified. Physis is healed; sarx is put to death and raised as healed flesh. The marriage of heaven and earth begins again.

This is why theology must speak both tongues. Genesis guards us from gnosticism — matter is good; Paul guards us from idolatry — matter is not god. Together they teach that salvation is not disembodiment but re-embodiment. The same dust that sinned will shine.

The gospel is not the rejection of matter but its redemption. The last Adam restores what the first forfeited: the harmony of Spirit and flesh, heaven and earth.

Hello, Dust. The Word still wears your skin.

Christological Fullness — God Marries Dust

At the centre of revelation stands not a text but a person. Yet the person fulfils the text, not replaces it. “In the beginning was the Word… and the Word became flesh.” John’s prologue reads Genesis in the light of Bethlehem. The same creative speech now takes human breath; the same Spirit who hovered over waters now hovers over Mary.

Incarnation is covenant renewal. God marries dust — not symbolically, but biologically. He takes the substance of Adam, the matter of Mary, the breath of YHWH Elohim. In Him, heaven and earth are reconciled. The gardener walks again in the cool of the day.

At the cross, curses converge: sweat, thorns, nakedness, blood, dust. The last Adam bears every consequence of the first. The ground that once groaned beneath Cain now drinks the blood that speaks a better word. The temple veil tears; the cherub’s sword rests. Exile is reversed not by decree but by death.

Resurrection is the consummation — the same body rises within the open seventh day: wounds intact, dust glorified. Redemption is not escape from matter but the marriage of matter to Spirit. Ascension does not erase the earth; it enthrones dust in heaven without closing the Day. Pentecost extends that union: the Spirit poured out on all flesh (bāśār), renewing the face of the earth and beginning the healing of sarx. And the enthroned Christ shares the Father’s Sabbath — ceasing-from-creating (not inactivity), but reign: creation complete, creation indwelt.

This is the centre from which every vocation, every ecology, every theology flows. The Incarnation is ontology healed; the Resurrection is teleology fulfilled. This is not a second creation project but creaturely participation in God’s finished melākâ. To be human is now to be included in this marriage — to be dust inhabited by divinity, labour (service) transfigured into worship.

Hello, Dust. Your Bridegroom has come.

Romans 8 — The Land Inhales, the Children Are Revealed

The plains of Moab whisper their echo through Paul’s letter to Rome. Between them lies the long history of exile and return, of covenant broken and renewed. Yet the same Spirit moves over both landscapes — the Breath that gave life to dust now groans within creation, awaiting its deliverance.

Paul does not invent a new cosmology; he recites Genesis from the far side of resurrection — Moab read in Greek, under Sabbath’s open Day. “The creation was subjected to futility” — this is Adam’s sending-away. “Not willingly” — the land did not sin, but it shared the consequences of its priest’s failure. “In hope” — because the same covenantal logic that joined man and soil in Eden binds them still in redemption. Creation waits, not for annihilation, but for adoption; not for erasure, but for unveiling. And adoption here is bodily: “the redemption of our bodies”; the land’s freedom rides that resurrection.

“The creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom of the glory of the children of God.” Here, the grammar of Genesis is fulfilled: dust to dust, breath to breath. The land groans like a woman in labour, and the church serves as midwife of that birth. When the children of God are revealed, the land inhales. The expulsion eastward ends; breath returns to the nostrils of the world. This unveiling is entry into the seventh day — the Day with no evening — not the launch of a new creative week.

Paul’s horizon is Moab’s promise expanded to cosmos. What Moses spoke of a land flowing with milk and honey becomes the universe filled with glory. The covenant scale enlarges; its logic holds. Faithfulness still yields fruitfulness; idolatry still withers. Yet now the field is all creation, and the harvest, resurrection.

For the Christian, this means that every act of faithful labour participates in that cosmic redemption. The carpenter’s bench, the gardener’s spade, the coder’s keyboard — all are altars if used in communion, idols if used in idolatry. Creation’s liberation is not detached from human vocation; it is covenantally bound to it. The Spirit groans not only in trees and tectonic plates but in the conscience of labourers, artists, engineers, and mothers, longing for right relation restored. But even here the line holds: our labour does not “finish” creation; it consents to God’s finished work.

The hope is not escape to heaven but the marriage of heaven and earth. “The whole creation waits,” Paul writes, “for the revealing of the sons of God.” The day of revelation is the wedding feast of matter and Spirit. The same body that bore curse will bear glory; the same soil that bore thorns will bear the Tree of Life.

Hello, Dust. The land is holding its breath for you.

1 Corinthians 7 — The Passing Schema and the Fulfilled Seed

Paul’s word that “the present schema of this world is passing away” is not nihilism but transformation. The Greek schēma (σχῆμα) means arrangement, structure, order of things. It is not creation itself that passes, but its current scaffolding — the temporal ordering under which marriage, mourning, commerce, and toil are framed. (Here and below, we reserve “work” for God’s melākâ; for humans we will speak of labour/service.)

In Genesis, creation’s order was good yet unripe. Humanity’s vocation — to serve and guard — was seed form, awaiting maturity. Sin arrested its growth; law sustained it in exile; Christ fulfills it in resurrection. The schema that passes is not substance but shadow. What abides is the covenantal ontology: Spirit-breathed dust, destined for glory. And what appears is the seventh-day arrangement: life arranged by God’s ceasing, not by our striving.

Paul’s use of marriage as example is precise. “Those who have wives should live as if they had none” — not call to neglect, but invitation to perspective. Marriage is prototype vocation: a covenant of two who become one flesh, an icon of Creator and creation. When the union it prefigures — Christ and His Church — is consummated, the sign yields to substance. The acorn becomes oak; the prototype fulfilled retires.

So too with labour. The scaffolds of wounded economy — wage, hierarchy, scarcity — will fall away, but the essence of human labour/service — service, creativity, communion — will remain, transfigured. Art will still make; song will still sound; cultivation will still bless. But competition will cease; toil will heal; dominion will become delight.

Paul’s counsel is eschatological realism. Hold your callings lightly, not because they are meaningless, but because their meaning is greater than their current form. The world’s structures tremble toward fulfilment. The bride prepares; the craftsman tests his work; the priest lays down scaffolds for the coming temple. We live now as new age offspring, glimpsing the seventh day breaking in like a faint dawn appearing on a high peak, while all below in the valley of this age, this present darkness (the sixth day) has not yet come to its close; for we do not yet see everything under Adam’s feet—much less every green leaf giving life to every breath-imbued dust-being that once heard the sound of YHWH God walking up and down in the wind of the day (cf. Gen 3:8; see also Gen 1:29–30).

“The time is short,” he writes. The acorn is splitting. Every vocation is under judgment — not destruction, but transformation. To work in this passing schema is to work in hope, knowing that the tree already buds within the seed.

Hello, Dust. Sow acorns; the oak is near.

Tools and Tech — On the Fault Line of Communion

The question that began with a quip — “What about software engineers?” — turns now to the telos of tools. Every artefact of human making stands on the border between mercy and estrangement. A tool can heal the distance between hand and earth, or widen it.

The spade extends the gardener’s reach but keeps skin close to soil. The plough magnifies strength but still remembers furrow and sweat. The keyboard and the screen, by contrast, interpose glass and algorithm between body and ground. The further the distance, the greater the discernment required.

Technology itself is not rebellion. The ark was technology; so was the tabernacle, so were musical instruments, ploughshares, temple embroidery. But each was measured by purpose — does it serve communion or sever it? The question is not whether software is evil but whether it catechises the soul toward presence or absence, neighbour or efficiency, empathy or abstraction. (Here and throughout, we measure by the seventh-day grammar: tools either consent to God’s melākâ completed and ceased or they catechise us to forget it.)

In Genesis, the first toolmaker is Cain’s line. Metalwork and music arise in the city east of Eden. These gifts are not condemned, but they grow from exile’s soil. They are mercy for a wounded world — scaffolds to endure estrangement, inventions to manage curse. Yet when tools become towers, when craft becomes competition, when making forgets meaning, Babel rises again. (Mercy becomes malpractice when scaffolds are mistaken for substance—when estrangement-tech claims to “continue creation” rather than serve and guard within it.)

Technology is the test of our ontology. If humanity is Spirit-breathed earth, then every invention must remain servant of that truth. Machines that train the body to forget its dust — its limits, rhythms, dependencies — risk teaching us a false theology. Software that simulates communion without presence, that abstracts flesh into data, can rehearse the old divorce of adam and adamah. Conversely, tools that school bodies into Sabbath — ceasing-from-creating as the frame of life — limit, attention, neighbourliness — can become sacraments of God’s ceasing within a noisy age. (Not because humans “work” the Sabbath, but because embodied habits of limit confess that God alone works and we are His workmanship.)

Yet mercy remains. Even in code, the Spirit can dwell. Words typed in exile can still bear blessing. The digital can become liturgical if ordered toward love. But discernment must be fierce, priestly, unflinching. “All things are lawful,” Paul said, “but not all things build up.” (Build up = serve and guard; do not confuse throughput with communion.)

The telos of technology is communion, not convenience. Its goodness is discerned only inside the open seventh day. The craftsman’s question is eternal: does this tool serve the garden, or fence it? Does it magnify care, or conceal it? Does it teach humility, or pride? Does it school dust toward presence, or drill flesh in abstraction?

Hello, Dust. Build, but remember: God alone works; you are His workmanship — receive breath, and serve and guard with it.

Solomon’s Empire — The Economy of Bodies

Israel begged for a king “like the nations,” and God, conceding, placed a Torah yoke upon the crown: do not multiply horses, gold, or wives; keep a copy of the Law; remember you are brother, not Pharaoh. Solomon begins in wisdom and ends in weight — conscription, quotas, forced labour. The temple rises, but the people bend. Brick replaces fruit; schedule replaces Sabbath (ceasing). Solomon began as gardener-king and ended as technocrat—who birthed a system, whose chariots rolled on the backs of taxed farmers.

In Solomon, Israel replayed Egypt under another name. Dominion forgot service; blessing became inventory. The man who wrote of love became the manager of labour. The king who named himself “Preacher” was enslaved by his projects: “All is vanity.” The machine fed on the soul of its maker.

What failed was not engineering or architecture but theology. Solomon’s court re-introduced a six-day economy with no seventh-day grammar. The king drove/extracted from Israel as if God had not already ceased from creating. Administration metastasised into extraction; liturgy into logistics. The knowledge of good and evil became bureaucracy, a machine to control, a powerhouse for conquest.

He churched the temple with untempered transactions to manufacture prosperity, and it became a choir-backed tax office. And the fruit of that tree (Wisdom), without Sabbath (ceasing; the fruit of the tree of life), brought death to both king and kingdom. In his lust for conquest, like the empires of old, he traded brides for alliances and, in so doing, commodified even the daughters of Jerusalem.

The irony of the Song of Songs is lost on most modern listeners: it subverts, not praises, love as conquest. One woman’s voice amidst a harem of priced lovers objects to being objectified in this economy of counting brides to dominate with a “banner” of love. In reversal of Solomon’s inversion, at the end of her song, her body, her garden, is not for sale, and she sends away her ‘beloved’ to chase others on his mountain tops of spices. The poem’s sensuous innocence is a luring protest—“shalom” (aka “solomon”) is a gift that cannot be attained by gaining but by ceasing.

The prophets saw it and wept. Isaiah, Amos, Micah—each thundered that worship divorced from justice is abomination. “You trample the poor,” they cried, “and yet bring offerings to My house.” When dominion seizes instead of stewarding, even sacrifice smells of smoke and not of grace.

Empire is the public forgetting that God alone works. When rulers imagine their productivity finishes what God began, melākâ is blasphemously transferred from God to government. The sign that this transfer has occurred is simple: Sabbath shrinks. Debts no longer release, fields never rest, servants cannot stop. Empire’s theology is always the same: control through counting, security through surplus, peace through management. But the kingdom of heaven arrives through wasteful grace—oil poured out, bread broken, nets bursting, treasure hidden in fields.

Prophetic judgment fell not only because of idolatry but because ceasing had been erased from public life. The remedy the prophets prescribe is not austerity but Sabbath re-institution — Jubilee as political repentance, a liturgy that confesses: “God alone completes creation; we will not enslave to make more world.”

Christ stands as anti-Solomon: Wisdom made poor, building no palace, riding no warhorse, owning no slaves. His temple is His body; His economy, generosity. He turns empire’s calculus upside down: the last are first, the poor blessed, the meek inheritors of earth.

Modern technocracy echoes Solomon’s sin. Bodies become data, labour becomes metrics, creation becomes resource. Yet within the digital Jerusalem, the same Spirit still sings the Song—calling lovers of God back to unpriced delight, to Sabbath (ceasing) economics, to covenantal awe.

Hello, Dust. Measure nothing but mercy. Rule as if the seventh day is already encircling your throne.

Four Kinds of Labour — Abiding, Prototype, Scaffold, Outlaw

Not all labour has the same future. All labour stands before judgment—not as courtroom condemnation but as fire that tests substance. “Each one’s labour will become manifest,” writes Paul, “for the Day will disclose it.” The furnace of glory does not merely punish; it purifies, distinguishing what endures from what evaporates.

Genesis gives us a sieve.

The first kind of labour is abiding: labour that participates in creation’s own telos, consonant with the essence of being human—Spirit-breathed dust serving and guarding the ground.

Abiding vocations are woven into Adam’s ontology — garden-husbandry, place-keeping, beauty-making, wisdom-sharing, relationship-building. These are priestly continuations of serving and guarding, forms that can pass through fire because they do not pretend to create new worlds.

Abiding vocations endure into the new creation because they are humanity itself that is being renewed; the Creator’s own handiwork that is being restored: Adam serving the Adamah.

The second kind is prototype labour: vocations that prefigure a perfection to come.

Prototype labour is temporary sign — like marriage; its fulfilment is the union of Christ and His Church. Prophecy is prototype—its perfection is the face-to-face knowledge of God. Art is prototype—its completion is the beauty of the renewed world. These labours are not discarded but subsumed, their essence carried forward like melody into symphony.

Prototype labour is not only a temporary sign — like sex, that signifies being joined to the Lord in one spirit (just as temple liturgies prefigured God-with-us-in-Jesus) -- it is also a temporary form (or ‘schema’), like childbirth; prefiguring the Church as Mother-of-all-the-living (the Eve). When the substance arrives, the sign retires without regret, just as when the drawings are completed, the plans are put on the shelf. The seed of the prototype endures, in the tree that replaces it, like an acorn becoming an oak.
The third kind is scaffold labour: instruments of grace that will be thanked and retired when the feast begins.

Scaffold labour vocations are merciful structures for a fractured world — medicine under mortality, law courts amid injustice, policing amid predation, coding and comms that bridge distance. Medicine heals what death has wounded; law restrains what sin has unleashed; governance orders what pride has disordered.

Scaffold vocations are good gifts under the curse, but they are not the building. They are removed when the building is restored; like plaster removed when a fracture is mended, they will cease when this present time is healed, the rebellion stilled, the order restored. To labour in them faithfully is to love the broken world while longing for its renewal.

The fourth kind is outlaw labour: labours born of estrangement, industries that feed on vice or vanity, systems that profit from exploitation or deceit.

Outlaw labour catechises exile — extraction that devours land and poor, propaganda that fractures communion, commerce that commodifies bodies, surveillance that replaces trust.

Outlaw labours cannot survive because they are by nature perishables—fabrications of hands twisting thorns into crowns; like an astronaut loading rocket fuel into his backpack when his journey bypasses the surface of the Sun. Grace may save a saint despite the loss of his souvenirs; a workforce may be salvaged even though the labour is scrapped and the industry shut down.

Discernment between these kinds requires not only ethics but eschatology. The question is not merely “is it right?” but “will it rise?” Labour must be judged by its telos: does it tend toward communion or isolation, healing or harm, renewal or ruin?

Each vocation is a site for sterilisation. The workshop is the smelter; the workplace, the crucible; the business, the altar; the marketplace, the laboratory test. The Spirit’s fire has already started raining down on Jesus’ flock, like acid on cold skin: the straw of pride, the stubble of greed, the hay of envy, all being highly volatile—livelihoods and lifestyles built with the timber of covetousness are all as combustible as consumerism itself. When we face the unshielded surface of the Son himself, what remains will be pure—purified people and pure humanity itself.

The sieve is Sabbath. Abiding labours already participate in God’s ceasing; prototypes hand off to fulfilment; scaffolds thankfully dismantle when no longer needed; outlaws repent or perish. Any labour that claims melākâ for itself will burn.

Labour as one whose labours will be tried with light hotter than a high-powered laser.

Hello, Dust. Choose labours that can cease.

Skin — First Vestment, Last Sermon

When God clothes the man and the woman in skins, it is the first act of priestly mercy. The garments are both covering and commissioning—an ordination into exile. Flesh is wrapped in flesh, life given for life. The earth’s first sacrifice is not human offering but divine provision. The covering enacts their confession that their flesh remains covenantal, now walking in breach, under repudiation. The skins do not hide their estrangement but testify to the mercy their flesh has witnessed.

In Eden, nakedness was communion; after their failure (to attain life—note, there was no ‘fall’ per se; there was failed fidelity and the forfeit of its fruit), nakedness becomes exposure; a door left open to what was once an invitation and is now a wound, susceptible to infection. The new vestment acknowledges death-as-judgment (not merely ‘mortality’) yet prophesies redemption. The body will henceforth mediate both shame and grace, curse and promise. Every thread of cloth, every touch of skin, carries theology.

In Israel’s tabernacle, the pattern deepens. The curtains and priestly garments extend that first tailoring. Priests are robed in linen, their bodies washed and anointed. Leprosy renders skin unclean because skin is the boundary of holiness—the place where spirit meets world. Covenant is written in flesh: circumcision cuts promise into skin; healing restores it; death rends it.

The prophets later clarify that Israel’s coverings point not backwards to Eden but forward to new creation: the coloured threads, cherubic embroidery, bells and pomegranates are signs that God would again dwell among dust. Their vestments were prototype: they reminded them of their distance while admitting the very nearness of YHWH. The prophets promise a return not via reformation, but by re-creation; of new hearts and new flesh, knit upon their dead bones.

In Christ, vestment in flesh is fulfilled. “The Word became flesh and tabernacled among us.” His skin is the temple curtain torn; His wounds are the openings of grace. Thomas’s fingers in the side are liturgy; Mary’s touch in the garden is doxology. The resurrected body, scars intact, declares that matter itself is redeemed. Flesh is no longer the problem but the proclamation.

Sabbath clarifies the point: garments are for days of toil; glory is for the Day of ceasing-from-creating. On the mountain, Christ’s flesh (that is, his face) becomes the source of light itself (that is, the Sun), concealed only by light — it is not removed, but transfigured: flesh is not discarded; but becomes a vesture of light because God’s indwelling presence is the clothing of creation when melākâ is confessed and ceasing-from-creating is entered.

Touch is the first sacrament. In every embrace, every act of care, every bread broken or tear wiped, the theology of skin is rehearsed. The Spirit anoints flesh not to deny it but to make it holy. To despise the body—one’s own or another’s—is to reject the Incarnation. To honour it is to remember baptism’s promise: this skin will rise.

Hello, Dust. Wear your flesh now as a priestly robe of mercy; unveiled grace that shines in darkness.

Sun and Son — Rolling the Scroll

Time itself is covenantal. The heavens declare glory not by noise but by rhythm—day to night, seedtime to harvest, sabbath to jubilee. When Moses taught Israel to number days, it was not to count but to consecrate. Every dawn is renewal of vow: the light returns, mercy repeats, creation turns another page in its liturgy of love.

The prophets called this rolling of the scroll: history as divine speech, each sunrise a syllable. “The sun of righteousness shall rise with healing in its wings,” Malachi promised. In Christ that dawn arrives. The Son becomes the Sun—the true light that the darkness cannot comprehend.

The cross is noon, the point of maximum exposure where shadow is shortest and truth longest. Resurrection is morning again, and Pentecost is the sun poured out on all flesh. Revelation ends where Genesis began: light spoken, world remade, time transfigured into eternity.

In Creation, Elohim’s summons to the light culminates in the appointment of the Sun, which rises to govern the Day of God’s melākâ from the heavens. In the End, the new creation appoints the Son, who comes as the light of God himself, and we serve by Him — the Word whose Sabbath ceasing crowns creation, for God alone completes creation.

Sabbath is the hinge between the ages. To cease is to participate in God’s own rhythm; to keep time holy is to resist empire’s endless production. Every Sabbath kept is a small rebellion against Pharaoh, a protest against utilitarian despair. To celebrate jubilee is to enact resurrection in miniature—to proclaim liberty to captives, to forgive debts, to let the land breathe. Time becomes medicine for creation’s wounds.

Tech that extends daylight can break, not bless. Used priestly, lamps may host vigil and keep a midwife watching with care. Used imposingly, neon invents a world without night while screens keep eyelids open and minds scrolling — refusal of limits, erasure of Sabbath, a counterfeit eternity made of workaholism and internet slavery. The test is ceasing: does the light teach rest or cancel it? The city coming from above will have no night, not because there is no rhythm, but because there will be no exhaustion; the day itself will be restorative and service itself will give Sabbath-shaped refreshment. We do not need to make eternal day, just as we do not need to try to avoid death; we have already crossed over to life—we need only learn to walk forward to meet the day.

Hello, Dust. Keep time as liturgy, not ledger. Switch off in faith; a new morning star is coming.

My Embodied Parable – Micro-moments of Jubilee

On my small island far south of Moab, the same covenant continues in miniature. Clay soils remember flood, rivulets thread through mist, and the wind catechises breath. Hands once trained for the office now turn soil. Here, the liturgy is the leaves: prune, mulch, listen, stop. My body has become my tutor: when the legs drag, the spade rests; when the mind fades, the tongue falls silent; when fatigue rains down, the stump becomes a pew. The act is ordinary but sacramental: repentance is the compost; striving is the weeds.

Each gesture is a token—a native transplanted, a skink rehomed, a puddle greeted—is a micro-priesthood of serving and guarding. Each restraint of resistance—letting the grass grow, leaving the bees be, forgiving an overhanging neighbour—is micro-jubilee: consent, not creation. These are not reforms but reorientations, embodied confessions that I am God’s gardener and this is his backyard.

Disease has exposed a lie embedded in me that I baptised — that I need to be productive; that God wants me working—as if melākâ were mine. God alone works and he alone completes creation; creation is completed on the seventh, not the sixth day: the seventh day is His ceasing-from-creating. I must cease self-creating and consent. The seventh-day gospel is my exorcism: I was not put here to be useful; I am formed to be faithful.

I now measure a day by consent, not output: Did I give to the ground—did I greet the dust with a touch of care—did I guard it from being ripped off? Did I enter the open Day by ceasing? Did I stop?
This is not retreat, it is subversion — Sabbath-rebellion against Pharaoh’s logic, a rubric of quietness and joy in less.

Hello, Dust. Your limits are your liturgy.

Reconciliation begins with my body, in my yard, not in the roof above my head, but in the filth under my feet. Theology is tangible; incarnation is embodiment.

Hello, Dust. Guard your personal space as if it were the Garden restored—your square metre as Eden saved.

Work as an End and the End as a Work

The last image of Scripture is not escape, but enclosure. Distinction, not extinction, is the end sown in soil; genesis as germination: “In beginning, Elohim created…and Elohim sees the light—that good—and separates between the light, and between the darkness.” Separation to him—which is what ‘holiness’ means—is the division: the difference is the distinction; ontology is the departure, like oil and water. The new creation is not built but embodied: it is a bride, not buildings—a city descends, but when we turn to look, it is a commune; not a quarantine—a people not a place; not a space of seclusion, for the gates are never shut. The openness of the new creation is its justice; the boundaries are ontological, not opposed onto others—they are freed and so are we, without fear: those outside nearness will not enter close proximity because coming close would for them be departure; a leaving behind of being—of being a ‘who’-man-doing (John 3:20); they are doing what they want: they love their ‘works’—their counter-melākâ—and they cannot cease their ‘working’—their refusal of ceasing before God’s melākâ. The unrestrained proximity of YHWH repels them even as their resistance marks them, like Cain, to further wandering outward and away in hatred of that light still reaching their night eyes, like a faint star still visible in an otherwise blackened sky. This is the final mercy: the wild are loosed to flee the high beams, and like Pluto, can never escape the pull of the Son at the centre, yet remain as far off as their nocturnal eyes can plummet, away from the burning brightness of the white-hot river flowing out from the Holy of Holies inside the inner room of the inner court of the new creation itself. For the tame, this overflow of God’s unbridled transparency draws us like toddlers to a table of delights, invigorates us like honey to bees, and fuels our intimacy like a honeymoon for young lovers.

Human ‘working’/labour therefore is ontologically determinative for humans—that is, our ‘works’ put us in contradiction to reality; for nothing counts as ‘work’ (melākâ) but God’s alone—the only alternative being labour/service as voluntary consent to God’s work (as opposed to revolt: humans ‘working’ against God’s melākâ). Consequently, human being becomes doing and human doing becomes being; we ‘are’ what we serve and what we serve is what we ‘are’ (or alternatively, we are what God works and what God works is what we are). In this way, we become what we come to be, and we come to be what we become in being—either, the human ‘worker’ becomes the ‘work’, an idolater the idol, or conversely, the convert becomes the converse; God’s workmanship: a convent in which the contents cease from attempting what God alone does.

In this sense, human ‘working’ is the end of humanity—or that human, not merely the means to that end—and at the same time, human ceasing-from-works is the beginning of humanity—or that human, and more, is the means to that beginning: consenting to God’s work and thereby becoming his workmanship—whose labour/service is worship.

“Behold, I am coming quickly…to render to each according to his works,” is faithfulness and fulfilment: “being unrighteous, let him be unrighteous…and the holy, let him be holy” (Revelation 22:11–12). This is judgment as revelation; an unveiling of reality itself—justice as disclosure: the appearing of true being beneath present appearances (aka Romans 2:5–11).

Vocational Finale

The line that sparked this conversation, “Ministers will be out of a job in the new creation, unlike gardeners,” left behind a splinter: “But what about software engineers?”. If ministry is a vocation of knowledge, it will cease; “for where there is prophecy, it will pass away”. So too, the coder’s keys: if software engineering is a vocation of translation—of constructing bespoke language—then it will cease: “for where there are tongues, they will be silenced.” (Not because speech is bad, but because mediation yields to nearness within the seventh day’s open holiness.) They are both scaffolds—both redundant and useless when the perfect has come; and so too knowledge itself—all forms of understanding are incomplete and transitional—like an engagement ring on a bride; it is true, —but merely promises what replaces it: the embodied experience of complete and full union itself. Like nappies and breast milk to a now-grown man, so too will be words of wisdom or the learning of languages to transfigured bodies in glory; we will know fully, even as we are fully known: that is, our faith, hope, and love will not only be fully and completely whole, it will be embodied.

The preacher, himself, will not be redundant in glory—when the Word he spoke has become the world he inhabits, when his sermons have yielded to songs; his vocation will be latreuō—serving-and-guarding within God’s finished melākâ, rather than proclamation-as-production. So too, the coder herself will not be retired in the new earth—when the script she encrypted has been transliterated into a legacy that echoes within circuits she now embodies; her vocation will be latreuō—presence-in-person within God’s finished works, rather than glorified messaging. Interfaces yield to communion; mediation yields to nearness.

It is true that the coder’s keys, like the gardener’s spade, the builder’s saw, even the artist's pen, can either reconcile or estrange. Indeed, some software is engineered to translate or communicate the Bible! Conversely, gardening may contaminate, just as coding may alienate. Both may serve communion or corrupt it: drawing fruit from fields to feed farms and families, or sowing poison in pretty patterns like a spider's web. Likewise, all trades—medicine, law, teaching, art, governance—sit on the same fault line. Each can heal or harm depending on its telos. The difference lies in posture: whether the worker stands as priest or as Pharaoh and his slaves.

The splinter in my hand is a spanner in the works, because when the sixth day ends and the Sabbath day dawns, much will cease—not only church labour but human labour; for “on it you shall do no melākâ”—that is the promise of the seventh day that remains for the people of God, and anyone who enters that Day ceases-from-works just as God ceases-from-creating. Sabbath here is ceasing-from-creating (not divine inactivity); melākâ remains God’s alone. The ontology of being will fulfil the vocation of doing. Even the tongue that prays now to God will cease its labour and fall silent when we dwell in oneness and union with YHWH Elohim—Being who is knowledge itself; love embodied.

Returning to the End

From the first breath to the final city, the story of dust is the story of marriage. Heaven and earth, Creator and creation, word and world—all reconciled in Christ. The line between gardener and coder, priest and engineer, prophet and labourer, is not hierarchy but harmony.

Genesis is ground zero not because it explains how the world began, but because it reveals why there is world at all—and who speaks it. The same Voice that said “In beginning…” now says “Behold, I make all things new.” The scroll that opened in dust closes in glory.

The work that God requires, said Jesus, is faith in him alone who works—yet even faith without love is nothing when all that remains is that which endures the holy presence of God himself. ‘Work’ here names God’s melākâ; our part is ceasing-from-works (justification) and serving-and-guarding (vocation as worship) within His finished works. The labour that will remain will not be ‘work’ as such, but re-creation—renewing our new-creational vows by honeymooning in our first love of joy, where vacation yields to vocation transfigured as presence, and hope itself is finally and fully realised: love will be the labour, and the labour will be love that embodies being itself.

Hello, Dust. You were breathed into being. Your ground is a covenant, your flesh a sacrament, your labour a liturgy. Live the six within the Seventh. Consent to the finished; guard what is given; wait for the Day with lamps lit. The Work is God’s. Be His workmanship. The remarriage of earth has begun.

God alone works; creation is what he does—his immanent handiwork; his indwelt house: being human is not working but being workmanship, animated dust called to worship—which is to serve, not God’s melākâ, but God in His works, by guarding and keeping what God does—his creation—foreshadowing the end within this Day, when a finish will be made at the dawn of the seventh-without-end, when his works will be complete, and He will Sabbath—ceasing from creating, blessing, and setting apart to Himself His completed works.

Coda.

Cease from creating; consent to being created: being near–in communion.

Afterword – the after words

Umbrellaed by mist dripping mountain tears before a city, not far from Cathedral Rock, whose southern lights echoed the great auroras of the south, was a valley where the earth still breathed. Adam was there, male and female, who in one flesh was dust animated and wedded to land, rising each morning to serve (ʿābad) and to guard (šāmar) the ground that held them in matrimony. They had no business—only a table; no clock—only light; no plans—only bliss. Each six days moved with a rhythm towards a great hush inside which on the seventh was not a gap but a glow: for God’s own ceasing-from-creating sat over the valley like weather.

In time, a merchant rose from the east with a great chest of tools, and hands that stretched out with a tongue that turned towards them. “These will let you reach what is far,” he said, “and speak when your mouths are absent.” The woman held out in her hand a seed and asked, “Is near not better than far?” The merchant smiled: “Near may cost you more.” He looked down to the tools he turned in his hand. They looked clever, and some were kind. “They might serve,” he said, “if you keep them as guests.” And Adam reached into the chest and took a tool in his hand.

Some tools helped carry praise—lifting songs from hillside to hillside so that the old and the sick could hear; some helped them order gifts—measuring out grain so less went hungry; some were scaffolds—good for a wound and laid down when the wound closed. But one tool came with a whisper: “Take more, and you will not need nearness.” It taught their hands to move without bodies and their voices to speak without breath. Soon, their table loosened from the soil; their meals became messages; their presence thinned to packets.

But an elder, older than the mountain, which for him was a stool for dustless soles, journeyed down and sat long whiles with them, and told of two trees. “One bears fruit which is gift-as-food—life received,” he said. “The other’s fruit is gift-not-food—wisdom revered. If you eat what should be set apart, you will curb your flesh against itself. Though the world may appear, your place in the midst will be forfeit, and you will wander far from the heart of the earth; eastward ever will be your habits. This dust remains good, but your flesh will need cleansing. Guard these gifts; do not keep them, but care for them.”

The voice of the elder offered no hand, but a word that turned them around, and they faced the land. And opening their hands, they repacked the chest. Some tools they kept, not to keep, but to care for—the tools that consented to the valley’s grammar. They guarded the scales that guarded justice, the ledger that remembered debts forgiven, and the bell that called neighbours to feast. They set aside the tool that promised presence without presence. And the woman said, “We will not eat wisdom,” and the man answered, “We will serve it.”

And the weather of those seasons turned to dancing. The man learned labour that is praise and labour that is possession. His hands learned to bless bread but not to brand it. The woman learned the measure of guarding—not to grip but to keep limit so that gifts remain given. Children grew up able to tell which tools were abiding (woven into creation’s end), which were prototypes (holy rehearsals), which were scaffolds (mercies for a wounded hour), and which were outlaws (catechisms of exile). They came together at table, and they learned this at the table, and the table was near.

Time turned, but not as calendars do. The valley’s seventh day shone within each new day. And the elder came again, and this time told with a voice that made their hearts feel like ears and their ears feel like hearts, “When my Bride appears, she will be as a city descending, not as your city rising, and your tongues will fall silent and your ledgers will close. Interfaces will retire, and communion will remain. You will not become less; you will become near. For God alone works (melākâ); you are His workmanship. Keep serving. Keep guarding. Cease from creating your own world; consent to His.”

And when harvest came again, they held that seed up. It had become bread, and both song and doxology. The merchant also returned and this time found them at table. “You’ve used my chest,” he said. “But only in part, I see.” And Adam replied as one: “These are the tools of a kind that let us be human-as-we-are—Adam, animated dust—keeping flesh and dust in covenant,” answered man; to which the woman added, “The rest we will thank and lay down when our nearness no more draws nigh full.”

And the valley breathed. And the rock was the cathedral, and the dust, its choir.

Add on – on adding

Excursus – The Past, Presence and Future in Hebrew Aspect (Not Tense)
Hebrew does not have tense but aspect; the seventh day is not “past” but is the active, enduring work of God that will be fully and finally finished and complete when there is no “evening and morning” to follow the close of our present day (Genesis 1:31). ‘Sabbath’ is not a noun in Genesis but a verb; something God alone does—His action of ceasing His work of creating—which is the horizon with no horizon within which labour receives meaning: it alone is God’s and He will not continue to do it forever—in beginning He makes an end; He moves in order to stop; cessation replaces creation when being transcends doing—Sabbath is the grammar of existence.

To confess Sabbath is to consent to being a creature—being a creature means ceasing in order to live. It is the renunciation of being a creator; the liturgical “Amen” to God’s melākâ. The grass of the field does not labour or spin, yet not even Solomon was dressed like one of their flowers. A gander will guard and a goose will keep, for creatures know that they worship, not work.

Excursus — Genesis 2:1–3: the triad of doublets (the Sabbath grammar spelled out)
The text’s cadence is juridical as well as lyrical: “completed/completed,” “work/work,” “ceased/ceased.” This 3×2 pattern is not ornamental; it legislates ontology. First, “completed” (kālāh) ×2 declares the whole as finished; second, “work” (melākâ) ×2 assigns ownership of labour to Elohim alone; third, “ceased” (šābat) ×2 specifies the nature of that completion—cessation from creating. The seventh day thereby becomes both verdict and vow: God’s creative activity is perfect and concluded; His sustaining presence now fills what He has finished. Because this day bears no “evening and morning,” its form is eschatological—an unclosed horizon that frames all subsequent time.

Excursus — Genesis 2:4: the toledoth as inward unfolding (not chronological sequel)
“These are the generations of the heavens and the earth in their being created, in the day YHWH Elohim made earth and heavens.” Here the toledoth opens not a timeline after completion but an interior view within God’s finished work. What follows (2:4b–25) is anthropology inside Sabbath: dust animated, garden assigned, priestly verbs given—all situated under God’s completed melākâ. Thus “serve and guard” are not postscript tasks; they are the creature’s life inside divine ceasing.

Hebrews 3–4 — The open Day and the unfinished entering
“There remains a Sabbath-ceasing for the people of God,” and “everyone who enters that stop, also ceases from his own works just as God does from his.” The apostolic witness confirms the Genesis signal: the seventh day is present as promise, future as fulfilment, and governing as frame. We have not yet entered in fullness (the sixth day still runs), yet the Day already governs Christian time (Lord’s Day as first-fruits of the seventh). Liturgically, the church lives proleptically: baptised into ceasing-from-works (as justification) and animated for serving-and-guarding (as vocation).

Revelation 21–22 — Creation as God’s work, enthroned in God
The canon closes where Genesis aims: no new creatures are fabricated; rather, creation is transfigured. “It is done” recapitulates “completed,” and the city-garden shows melākâ fulfilled as indwelling glory. Humanity’s eternal “service” (latreuō) is not co-creation but priestly tending of what God has finished—water of life, tree of life, leaves for healing—Sabbath service without sweat, guardianship without violence, dominion without domination.

Sabbath economics — ceasing as the shape of justice
If God’s last creative deed is ceasing, then the moral form of creaturely life is limit. Sabbath, sabbatical years, and jubilee encode divine ceasing into social time: fields rest, debts release, slaves go free, measures are honest, scales unrigged. Justice is not an add-on to theology; it is Sabbath made public. Any economy that refuses limit refuses the seventh day and will grind dust into bricks. Any polity that honours limit will find its labour becoming doxology.

Glossary – words that weight up

Adamah (Hebrew) – the ground/land/soil/earth as covenant partner with humanity — responsive to worship or violence; spouse of Adam under God.
Adam – the earth-being, Spirit-breathed dust, priest of creation.
ʿĀphār (Hebrew): Dust – good ontology — the creaturely substrate God animates; not unclean, not disposable or corruptible.
Adamah (ground/land):
Physis (Greek) – nature; creation’s given being, awaiting glory.
Melākâ (Hebrew): God’s work, uniquely His. In Genesis 2:1–3 God “completes” and “ceases” His melākâ — not all action, but the action of creating. Creation is henceforward His “works,” sustained and indwelt, not added to.
Sabbath (šabbāt in Hebrew): God’s ceasing from creating — enthronement presence, not divine nap; the Day with no evening, open and promised.
Bāśār / Sarx (flesh in Hebrew / Greek): Flesh as covenant medium / flesh under corruption. Dust is good; flesh requires cleansing; sarx must die and rise.
ʿĀbad / Šāmar (serve/guard in Hebrew): Priestly verbs — humanity’s vocation within God’s finished work; participation, not production.
Schema (Greek): Passing arrangement of the world; scaffolding that yields to seventh-day fulfilment.
Ontology – what something is by nature.
Vocation – what something is called to do by purpose.
Telos – the end, goal, or fulfilment toward which creation moves.
Covenant – divine relationship binding Creator, human, and creation in mutual fidelity.
Exile – consequence of covenant breach; estrangement from land and God.
Incarnation – God marrying dust; Word made flesh.
Resurrection – dust glorified; creation reborn.
Jubilee – time as medicine; release, restoration, rest.
Priesthood – mediation between Creator and creation through service, guarding, and praise.
Fall — avoided in this work; Scripture shows failure/forfeit and eastward sending-away, not loss of an independent “immortality.”

Talking Christianity

Search

Hello, Dust!

The Soil of Separation and the Remarriage of the Earth

Adam and Adamah — Dust, Flesh, Land, and Labour

No comments: